Why Should We Pay Any Attention to Him? He Can’t Even Get a Letter to the Editor Published!

This is a sort of good news, bad news story. First, the good news. I’ve had another comment published in Science. Now the bad news. I submitted it as a Letter to the Editor. I’m beginning to get the feeling that they don’t want criticism in their Letters, only value added kinds of comments. That’s not [as we used to say] my thing. Ah, well.
     It’s nothing you haven’t seen before. It’s just a succinct balloon-bursting of the dating in the Wilkins et al. paper on 500,000 year old spear points at Kathu Pan 1, South Africa. I don’t know if it’s behind a pay-wall. It’s here, if you’re interested. I’ve already written to them hoping they can clean up the glitchy quote marks around the first occurrence of ‘spring vent’ in the first paragraph.  

My ‘other’ moment in the sun.

     So, there you have it. Direct from the foremost exponent of destructive archaeological criticism.

SA announces new posts on the Subversive Archaeologist‘s facebook page (mirrored on Rob Gargett’s page), on Robert H. Gargett‘s Academia.edu page, Rob Gargett‘s twitter account, and his Google+ page. A few of you have already signed up to receive email when I post. Others have subscribed to the blog’s RSS feeds. You can also become a ‘member’ of the blog through Google Friend Connect. Thank you for your continued patronage. You’re the reason I do this.